Anonymous
×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 105 articles on MOR Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



MOR Wiki

FitzHugh-Nagumo System

Revision as of 11:06, 23 November 2018 by Himpe (talk | contribs) (→‎Dimensions: add output)


Description

The FitzHugh-Nagumo system describes a prototype of an excitable system, e.g., a neuron. If the external stimulus exceeds a certain threshold value, then the system will exhibit a characteristic excursion in phase space, representing activation and deactivation of the neuron. This behaviour is typical for spike generations (=short elevation of membrane voltage) in a neuron after stimulation by an external input current.

Figure 1: FitzHugh-Nagumo System

Model Equations

Here, we present the setting from [1], where the dynamics of the system is governed by the following coupled nonlinear PDEs:


\epsilon v_t(x,t)=\epsilon^2v_{xx}(x,t)+f(v(x,t))-w(x,t)+g,

 w_t(x,t)=hv(x,t)-\gamma w(x,t)+g,

with f(v)=v(v-0.1)(1-v) and initial and boundary conditions


  v(x,0)=0,\quad w(x,0)=0, \quad x\in [0,1],

  v_x(0,t)=-i_0(t), \quad v_x(1,t)\quad =0, \quad t \geq 0,

where \epsilon=0.015,\;h=0.5,\;\gamma=2,\;g=0.05;\;i_0(t)=5\cdot
10^4t^3 \exp(-15t) is the external stimulus, and the variables v and w are the voltage and the recovery of the voltage, respectively. xx--CrossReference--dft--fig:fhn--xx shows the typical limit cycle behaviour described above.

Reformulation as a quadratic-bilinear system

Instead of the cubic system of ODEs, one can alternatively study a so-called quadratic-bilinear control system of the form


 E\dot{x}(t) = A x(t) + H x(t) \otimes x(t) + \sum_{j=1}^2 N_j x(t) u_j(t) + B u(t),

with E,A,N_j \in \mathbb R^{n\times n}, j \in\{1,2\}, \ H \in \mathbb R^{n\times n^2} and  B \in \mathbb R^{n\times 2}, and the input function is u(t)=[i_0(t),1]. The idea relies on artificially introducing a new state variable defined as z(t)=v(t)^2 and subsequently computing the dynamics of the new variable, i.e., specifying \dot{z}(t). The technique goes back to [2], where it is successfully applied to several smooth nonlinear control-affine systems. As discussed in [3], introducing z as an addictional variable yields a quadratic-bilinear control of dimension  n = 3\cdot k, where k denotes the number of discretization nodes for each PDE, with state vector x = [v,w,z]^T. The increase of the state dimension has the advantage of reducing the nonlinearity from cubic to quadratic. This, however, opens up the possibility to reduce the system by model reduction schemes developed for quadratic-bilinear systems such as balanced truncation [4], or interpolation-based approaches, e.g., given in [3] and [2].

Data

In [1], the previous system of coupled nonlinear PDEs is spatially discretized by means of a finite difference scheme with k=512 nodes for each PDE. Hence, one obtains a nonlinear (cubic) system of ODEs with state dimension 2\cdot k=1024. As discussed above, the nonlinear system can be rewritten as a quadratic-bilinear system of dimension 3\cdot k=1536, and all matrices of the quadratic-bilinear formulation discretized are in the Matrix Market format. The matrix name is used as an extension of the matrix file and can be found at:

FitzNagumo.tar.gz.

The archive contains the matrices E, A, B, H and N_1; The matrix N_2 is a zero matrix of appropiate size.

For more information on the discretization details, see [1].

In addition, one can have an output


 y(t) = Cx(t),

where the matrix C is a 2\times N matrix such that C(1,1) = 1,
C(2,1+k) = 1 and the other elements are zero. This output y(t) corresponds to the left boundary of the limit cycles. For more information on the output, see [3].

Dimensions

System structure:


\begin{align}
 E\dot{x}(t) &= A x(t) + H x(t) \otimes x(t) + \sum_{i=1}^2N_i x(t) u_i(t) + B u(t) \\
 y(t) &= Cx(t)
\end{align}

System dimensions:

E \in \mathbb{R}^{1536 \times 1536}, A \in \mathbb{R}^{1536 \times 1536}, H \in \mathbb{R}^{1536 \times 2359296}, N_1 \in \mathbb{R}^{1536 \times 1536}, N_2 \in \mathbb{R}^{1536 \times 1536}, B \in \mathbb{R}^{1536 \times 2}, C \in \mathbb{R}^{2 \times 1536}.

Citation

To cite this benchmark, use the following references:

  • For the benchmark itself and its data:
The MORwiki Community, FitzHugh-Nagumo System. MORwiki - Model Order Reduction Wiki, 2018. http://modelreduction.org/index.php/FitzHugh-Nagumo_System
@MISC{morwiki_modFHN,
  author =       {{The MORwiki Community}},
  title =        {FitzHugh-Nagumo System},
  howpublished = {{MORwiki} -- Model Order Reduction Wiki},
  url =          {http://modelreduction.org/index.php/FitzHugh-Nagumo_System},
  year =         2018
}

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 S. Chaturantabut and D.C. Sorensen, "Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation", SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32: 2737--2764, 2010.
  2. 2.0 2.1 C. Gu, "QLMOR: A Projection-Based Nonlinear Model Order Reduction Approach Using Quadratic-Linear Representation of Nonlinear Systems", IEEE T. Comput. Aid. D., 30: 1307--1320, 2011.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 P. Benner and T. Breiten, "Two-Sided Moment Matching Methods for Nonlinear Model Reduction", SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 37(2): B239--B260, 2015.
  4. P. Benner and P. Goyal, "Balanced Truncation Model Order Reduction for Quadratic-Bilinear Systems", arXiv e-prints, 2017

Contact

Tobias Breiten