(some restructuring) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Category:linear algebra]] |
[[Category:linear algebra]] |
||
− | + | '''Balanced Truncation''' is an important projection model reduction method which delivers high quality reduced models by making an extra effort in choosing the projection subspaces. |
|
+ | ==Derivation == |
||
− | A stable minimal (controllable and observable) system <math>\Sigma</math> |
+ | A stable minimal (controllable and observable) system <math>\Sigma</math>, realized by <math>(A,B,C,D)</math> |
− | <math> |
+ | <math> \dot{x} = Ax + Bu</math> |
+ | <math> y = Cx + Du</math> |
||
+ | is called balanced<ref>B.C. Moore, "<span class="plain_links">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1981.1102568 Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction]</span>", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , vol.26, no.1, pp.17,32, Feb 1981</ref>, if the systems [[wikipedia:Controllability_Gramian|Controllability Gramian]] and [[wikipedia:Observability_Gramian|Observability Gramian]], the solutions <math>W_C</math> and <math>W_O</math> of the Lyapunov equations |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | <math> AW_C+W_CA^T=-BB^T </math> |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | <math> A^TW_O+W_OA=-C^TC </math> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
− | The truncated reduced system is then given by |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | The balanced systems states are ordered (descendingly) by how controllable and observable they are, thus allowing a partion of the form: |
||
+ | |||
⚫ | |||
+ | |||
+ | By truncating the discardable states, the truncated reduced system is then given by <math> \hat{\Sigma}=(\tilde{A}_{11},\tilde{B}_1,\tilde{C}_1,\tilde{D}) </math>. |
||
== Implementation: SR Method== |
== Implementation: SR Method== |
||
− | One computes it for example by the SR Method. |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | The necessary balancing transformation can be computed by the SR Method<ref>A.J. Laub; M.T. Heath; C. Paige; R. Ward, "<span class="plain_links">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1987.1104549 Computation of system balancing transformations and other applications of simultaneous diagonalization algorithms]</span>," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.32, no.2, pp.115,122, Feb 1987</ref>. |
||
⚫ | |||
+ | Next, the Singular Value Decomposition of <math> SR^T\;</math> is computed: |
||
+ | <math> SR^T= U\Sigma V^T.</math> |
||
− | <math> SR^T=\begin{bmatrix} U_1 U_2 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \Sigma_1 & \\ & \Sigma_2\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} V_1^T\\V_2^T\end{bmatrix}</math> |
||
+ | Now, partitioning <math>U,V</math>, for example based on the Hankel singuar Values, gives |
||
− | Then the reduced order model is given by <math>(W^TAV,W^TB,CV,D)\;</math> where |
||
− | <math> |
+ | <math>SR^T= \begin{bmatrix} U_1 U_2 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} \Sigma_1 & \\ & \Sigma_2\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} V_1^T\\V_2^T\end{bmatrix}.</math> |
+ | The truncation of discardable partitions <math>U_2,V^T_2,\Sigma_2</math> results in the reduced order model <math>(P^TAQ,P^TB,CQ,D)\;</math> where |
||
+ | <math> P=R^T V_1\Sigma_1^{-\frac{1}{2}},</math> |
||
⚫ | |||
− | <math> \ |
+ | <math> Q= S^T U_1 \Sigma_1^{-\frac{1}{2}}.</math> |
+ | |||
⚫ | <math>Q^TP=I_r</math> makes <math> QP^T</math> an oblique projector and hence '''Balanced Trunctation''' a Petrov-Galerkin projection method. The reduced model is stable with Hankel Singular Values given by <math>\sigma_1,\dots,\sigma_r</math>, where r is the order of the reduced system. It is possible to choose <math>r</math> via the computable error bound<ref>D.F. Enns, "<span class="plain_links">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1984.272286 Model reduction with balanced realizations: An error bound and a frequency weighted generalization]</span>," The 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol.23, pp.127,132, Dec. 1984</ref>: |
||
+ | |||
+ | <math> \|\Sigma-\hat{\Sigma}\|_2 \leq 2 \|u\|_2 \sum_{k=r+1}^n\sigma_k. </math> |
||
==References== |
==References== |
||
+ | |||
+ | <references/> |
Revision as of 11:53, 23 April 2013
Balanced Truncation is an important projection model reduction method which delivers high quality reduced models by making an extra effort in choosing the projection subspaces.
Derivation
A stable minimal (controllable and observable) system , realized by
is called balanced[1], if the systems Controllability Gramian and Observability Gramian, the solutions and
of the Lyapunov equations
respectively, satisfy with
.
Since in general, the spectrum of
are the squared Hankel Singular Values for such a balanced system, they are given by:
.
An arbitrary system can be transformed into a balanced system
via a state-space transformation:
This transformed system has balanced Gramians and
which are equal and diagonal.
The balanced systems states are ordered (descendingly) by how controllable and observable they are, thus allowing a partion of the form:
.
By truncating the discardable states, the truncated reduced system is then given by .
Implementation: SR Method
The necessary balancing transformation can be computed by the SR Method[2].
First, the Cholesky factors of the gramians are computed.
Next, the Singular Value Decomposition of
is computed:
Now, partitioning , for example based on the Hankel singuar Values, gives
The truncation of discardable partitions results in the reduced order model
where
makes
an oblique projector and hence Balanced Trunctation a Petrov-Galerkin projection method. The reduced model is stable with Hankel Singular Values given by
, where r is the order of the reduced system. It is possible to choose
via the computable error bound[3]:
References
- ↑ B.C. Moore, "Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction", IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , vol.26, no.1, pp.17,32, Feb 1981
- ↑ A.J. Laub; M.T. Heath; C. Paige; R. Ward, "Computation of system balancing transformations and other applications of simultaneous diagonalization algorithms," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol.32, no.2, pp.115,122, Feb 1987
- ↑ D.F. Enns, "Model reduction with balanced realizations: An error bound and a frequency weighted generalization," The 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, vol.23, pp.127,132, Dec. 1984