Anonymous
×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 105 articles on MOR Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



MOR Wiki

Difference between revisions of "Thermal Block"

Line 13: Line 13:
   
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
A parametric semi-discretized heat transfer problem with varying heat transfer coefficients, the parameters, on subdomains. This model is also called ''cookie baking problem'', or can be viewed as a flattened 2-D version of the "skyscraper problem" from high performance computing.
+
A parametric semi-discretized heat transfer problem with varying heat transfer coefficients, the parameters, on subdomains. This model is also called ''cookie baking problem'', or can be viewed as a flattened 2-D version of the ''skyscraper problem'' from high performance computing.
   
 
<figure id="fig1">[[File:ThermalBlockDomain.svg|490px|thumb|right|<caption>The computational domain and boundaries.</caption>]]</figure>
 
<figure id="fig1">[[File:ThermalBlockDomain.svg|490px|thumb|right|<caption>The computational domain and boundaries.</caption>]]</figure>

Revision as of 09:04, 11 March 2020

Under Construction.png Note: This page has not been verified by our editors.


Description

A parametric semi-discretized heat transfer problem with varying heat transfer coefficients, the parameters, on subdomains. This model is also called cookie baking problem, or can be viewed as a flattened 2-D version of the skyscraper problem from high performance computing.

Figure 1: The computational domain and boundaries.
Figure 2: A sample heat distribution at time 1.0 for parameter choice [100, 0.01, 0.001, 0.0001].
Figure 3: Sigma magnitude plot of the single parameter variant.

Modeling

Consider a parameter \mu\in{[10^{-6},10^2]}^4\subset\mathbb{R}^{4} and define the heat conductivity \sigma(\xi; \mu) as 1.0 when \xi\in\Omega_0 and \sigma(\xi; \mu)=\mu_i when \xi\in\Omega_i. The heat distribution is governed by the equation:


 \partial_t \theta(t, \xi; \mu) + \nabla \cdot (- \sigma(\xi; \mu) \nabla \theta(t, \xi; \mu)) = 0,\text{ for } t\in (0,T), \text{ and } \xi \in \Omega,

with a heat-inflow condition on the left (Neumann boundary)


    \sigma(\xi; \mu) \nabla \theta(t, \xi; \mu) \cdot n(\xi) = u(t)\text{ for } t \in (0,T), \text{ and } \xi \in \Gamma_{in},

perfect isolation on the top and bottom (Neumann-zero boundary)


    \sigma(\xi; \mu) \nabla \theta(t, \xi; \mu) \cdot n(\xi) = 0\text{ for } t \in (0,T), \text{ and } \xi \in \Gamma_N,

and fixed temperature on the right (Dirichlet boundary)


    \theta(t, \xi; \mu) = 0\text{ for } t \in (0,T), \text{ and } \xi \in \Gamma_{D},

and initial condition


    \theta(0, \xi; \mu) = 0 \text{ for } \xi \in \Omega.

Discretization

For the discretization, FEniCS 2019.1 was used on a simplicial grid with first order elements. The mesh is generated from the domain specification using gmsh 3.0.6 with 'clscale' set to 0.1. The Python-based source code for the discretization can be found at Zenodo.

Origin

This benchmark was developed for the MODRED 2019 proceedings[1].

Data

The benchmark includes the basic domain description as a gmsh input file, Python scripts for the matrix assembly, simulation in pyMOR and visualization as VTK, together with the matrices both as one combined file ABCE.mat or separate matrix market files for all matrices. The sources and the ABCE.mat are available for download at Zenodo.

Note that the heat transfer coefficients are designed as characteristic functions on the domains, such that the system is only well-posed when all entries in \mu are positive.

Dimensions

System structure:


\begin{align}
E\dot{x}(t) &= (A_0 + \mu_1 A_1 + \mu_2 A_2 + \mu_3 A_3 + \mu_4 A_4) x(t) + Bu(t), \\
y(t) &= Cx(t)
\end{align}


System dimensions:

E \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}, A_0 \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}, A_1 \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}, A_2 \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}, A_3 \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}, A_4 \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times N}, B \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times 1}, C \in \mathbb{R}^{4 \times N},

where N=7\,488 for the system matrices given in ABCE.mat.

Variants

Besides the full four parameter setup, the model can be used in variations with other numbers of independent parameters. The following two are recommended in the original work and have been investigated in the literature[2],[3],[4].

Single parameter

The interpretation of the thermal block as the "cookie backing" problem with slight variation in the dough leads to an easy one parameter variant. Here the new single parameter \hat\mu\in [ 10^{-6}, 10^2] is chosen such that  \mu = \hat\mu\left[0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8\right].

Non-parametric

The system can be used as a standard LTI state-space model. It is recommended to use \mu = \sqrt{10} [0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8].

Citation

To cite this benchmark, use the following references:

  • For the benchmark itself and its data:
S. Rave and J. Saak, Thermal Block. MORwiki - Model Order Reduction Wiki, 2020. http://modelreduction.org/index.php/Thermal_Block
@MISC{morwiki_thermalblock,
  author =       {Rave, S. and Saak, J.},
  title =        {Thermal Block},
  howpublished = {{MORwiki} -- Model Order Reduction Wiki},
  url =          {http://modelreduction.org/index.php/Thermal_Block},
  year =         2020
}
  • For the background on the benchmark:
S. Rave and J. Saak, An Instationary Thermal-Block Benchmark Model for Parametric Model Order Reduction. e-prints 2003.00846, arXiv, math.NA (2020).
@TECHREPORT{morRavS20,
  author =       {Rave, S. and Saak, J.},
  title =        {An Instationary Thermal-Block Benchmark Model for Parametric
                  Model Order Reduction},
  institution =  {arXiv},
  type =         {e-print},
  number =       {2003.00846},
  note =         {math.NA},
  year =         2020,
  url =          {https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00846}
}

References

  1. S. Rave, J. Saak, An Instationary Thermal-Block Benchmark Model for Parametric Model Order Reduction, e-prints 2003.00846, arXiv, math.NA (2020).
  2. P. Benner, S. W. R. Werner, MORLAB -- the Model Order Reduction LABoratory, e-print 2002.12682, arXiv, cs.MS (2020).
  3. C. Himpe, Comparing (empirical-Gramian-based) model order reduction algorithms, e-prints 2002.12226, arXiv, math.OC (2020).
  4. P. Benner, M. Köhler, J. Saak, Matrix equations, sparse solvers: M-M.E.S.S.-2.0.1 – philosophy, features and application for (parametric) model order reduction, eprints 2003.02088, arXiv, cs.MS (2020).

Contact

Jens Saak