Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
</math> |
</math> |
||
− | with <math>E,A,N_j \in \mathbb R^{n\times n}, j \in\{1,2\}, \ H \in \mathbb R^{n\times n^2} </math> and <math> B \in \mathbb R^{n\times 2}.</math> The idea relies on artificially introducing a new state variable defined as <math>z(t)=v(t)^2</math> and subsequently computing the dynamics of the new variable, i.e., specifying <math>\dot{z}(t).</math> The technique goes back to <ref name="gu11">C. Gu, "<span class="plainlinks">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2011.2142184 QLMOR: A Projection-Based Nonlinear Model Order Reduction Approach Using Quadratic-Linear Representation of Nonlinear Systems]</span>", IEEE T. Comput. Aid. D., 30 (2011), pp. 1307-1320.</ref>, where it is successfully applied to several smooth nonlinear control-affine systems. As discussed in <ref name="benner12">P. Benner and T. Breiten, "<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/preprints/2012/12/ Two-Sided Moment Matching Methods for Nonlinear Model Eeduction]</span>", 2012, Preprint MPIMD/12-12.</ref>, introducing <math>z</math> as an addictional variable yields a quadratic-bilinear control of dimension <math> n = 3\cdot k</math> with state vector <math>x = [v,w,z]^T.</math> The increase of the state dimension has the advantage of reducing the nonlinearity from cubic to quadratic. This however opens up the possibility to reduce the system by the generalized moment-matching approach from <ref name="gu11"/>, see also <ref name="benner12"/> for more details on the implementation. |
+ | with <math>E,A,N_j \in \mathbb R^{n\times n}, j \in\{1,2\}, \ H \in \mathbb R^{n\times n^2} </math> and <math> B \in \mathbb R^{n\times 2}.</math> The idea relies on artificially introducing a new state variable defined as <math>z(t)=v(t)^2</math> and subsequently computing the dynamics of the new variable, i.e., specifying <math>\dot{z}(t).</math> The technique goes back to <ref name="gu11">C. Gu, "<span class="plainlinks">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2011.2142184 QLMOR: A Projection-Based Nonlinear Model Order Reduction Approach Using Quadratic-Linear Representation of Nonlinear Systems]</span>", IEEE T. Comput. Aid. D., 30 (2011), pp. 1307-1320.</ref>, where it is successfully applied to several smooth nonlinear control-affine systems. As discussed in <ref name="benner12">P. Benner and T. Breiten, "<span class="plainlinks">[http://www.mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de/preprints/2012/12/ Two-Sided Moment Matching Methods for Nonlinear Model Eeduction]</span>", 2012, Preprint MPIMD/12-12.</ref>, introducing <math>z</math> as an addictional variable yields a quadratic-bilinear control of dimension <math> n = 3\cdot k</math>, where <math>k</math> denotes the number of discretization nodes for each PDE, with state vector <math>x = [v,w,z]^T.</math> The increase of the state dimension has the advantage of reducing the nonlinearity from cubic to quadratic. This however opens up the possibility to reduce the system by the generalized moment-matching approach from <ref name="gu11"/>, see also <ref name="benner12"/> for more details on the implementation. |
==Data== |
==Data== |
Revision as of 10:50, 29 March 2018
Description
The FitzHugh-Nagumo system describes a prototype of an excitable system, e.g., a neuron. If the external stimulus exceeds a certain threshold value, then the system will exhibit a characteristic excursion in phase space, representing activation and deactivation of the neuron. This behaviour is typical for spike generations (=short elevation of membrane voltage) in a neuron after stimulation by an external input current.
Model Equations
Here, we present the setting from [1], where the equations for the dynamical system read
with and initial and boundary conditions
where is the external stimulus, and the variables
and
are the voltage and the recovery of the voltage, respectively. xx--CrossReference--dft--fig:fhn--xx shows the typical limit cycle behaviour described above.
Reformulation as a quadratic-bilinear system
Instead of the cubic system of ODEs, one can alternatively study a so-called quadratic-bilinear control system of the form
with and
The idea relies on artificially introducing a new state variable defined as
and subsequently computing the dynamics of the new variable, i.e., specifying
The technique goes back to [2], where it is successfully applied to several smooth nonlinear control-affine systems. As discussed in [3], introducing
as an addictional variable yields a quadratic-bilinear control of dimension
, where
denotes the number of discretization nodes for each PDE, with state vector
The increase of the state dimension has the advantage of reducing the nonlinearity from cubic to quadratic. This however opens up the possibility to reduce the system by the generalized moment-matching approach from [2], see also [3] for more details on the implementation.
Data
In [1], the previous system of coupled nonlinear PDEs is spatially discretized by means of a finite difference scheme with nodes for each PDE. Hence, one obtains a nonlinear (cubic) system of ODEs with state dimension
. All matrices of the quadratic-bilinear formulation discretized with
are in the Matrix Market format. The matrix name is used as an extension of the matrix file and can be found at:
For the input function, we have . For more information on the discretization details, see [1].
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 S. Chaturantabut and D.C. Sorensen, "Nonlinear Model Reduction via Discrete Empirical Interpolation", SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32 (2010), pp. 2737-2764.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 C. Gu, "QLMOR: A Projection-Based Nonlinear Model Order Reduction Approach Using Quadratic-Linear Representation of Nonlinear Systems", IEEE T. Comput. Aid. D., 30 (2011), pp. 1307-1320.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 P. Benner and T. Breiten, "Two-Sided Moment Matching Methods for Nonlinear Model Eeduction", 2012, Preprint MPIMD/12-12.