Anonymous
×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 106 articles on MOR Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Moment-matching PMOR method: Difference between revisions

Line 17: Line 17:
system, respectively.  
system, respectively.  


To obtain the reduced model in (2), a
To obtain the reduced model in (2), a [[Projection_based_MOR|projection]] matrix  
projection matrix <math>V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times r}, r\ll n</math> has to be computed.
<math>V \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times r}, r\ll n</math> has to be computed.


:<math>V^T(E_0+s_1E_1+s_2E_2+\ldots +s_pE_p)Vx=V^TBu(s_1,\ldots,s_p), </math>  
:<math>V^T(E_0+s_1E_1+s_2E_2+\ldots +s_pE_p)Vx=V^TBu(s_1,\ldots,s_p), </math>  

Revision as of 08:31, 22 May 2013


Description

The method introduced here is described in [1] and [2], which is an extension of the Moment-matching method for nonparametric systems (see [3], [4] for moment-matching MOR). The method is applicable for linear parametrized systems, either in frequency domain or in time domain. For example, the parametric system in frequency domain:

(E0+s1E+s2E2++spEp)x=Bu(s1,,sp),y=Cx,(1)

where s1=j2πf is the frequency domain variable, f is the frequency. s2,s3,,sp are the parameters of the system. They can be any scalar functions of some source parameters, like s2=et, where t is time, or combinations of several physical (geometrical) parameters like s2=ρv, where ρ and v are two independent physical (geometrical) parameters. x(t)n is the state vector, udI and ydO are the inputs and outputs of the system, respectively.

To obtain the reduced model in (2), a projection matrix Vn×r,rn has to be computed.

VT(E0+s1E1+s2E2++spEp)Vx=VTBu(s1,,sp),
y=CVx.(2)

The matrix V is derived by orthogonalizing a number of moment matrices of the system in (1) as follows, see [1] or [2].

By defining E~=E0+s10E1+s20E2++sp0Ep, and BM=E~1B,Mi=E~1Ei,i=1,2,,p, we can expand x in (1) at s1,s2,,sp around p0=[s10,s20,,sp0] as below,

x=[I(σ1M1++σpMp)]1BMu(s1,,sp)=i=0(σ1M1++σpMp)iBMu(s1,,sp).

Here σi=sisi0,i=1,2,,p. We call the coefficients in the above series expansion moment matrices of the parametrized system, i.e. BM,M1BM,,MpBM,M12BM,(M1M2+M2M1)BM,,(M1Mp+MpM1)BM,Mp2BM,M13BM,. The corresponding moments of the transfer function are those moment matrices multiplied by C from the left. The matrix V can be generated by first explicitly computing some of the moment matrices and then orthogonalizing them as suggested in [1]. The resulting V is desired to expand the subspace:

range{V}=span{BM, M1BM,,MpBM, M12BM,(M1M2+M2M1)BM,,(M1Mp+MpM1)BM,
Mp2BM,M13BM,,M1rBM,,MprBM}.(3)

However, V does not really span the whole subspace, because the latterly computed vectors in the subspace become linearly dependent due to numerical instability. Therefore, with this matrix V one cannot get an accurate reduced model which matches all the moments algebraically included in the subspace.

Instead of directly computing the moment matrices in (3), a numerically robust method is proposed in [2] ( the detailed algorithm is described in [5] ), which combines the recursion in (5) with the modified Gram-Schmidt process to implicitly compute the moment matrices. The computed V is actually an orthonormal basis of the subspace as below,

range{V}=span{R0,R1,,Rr}.(4)


R0=[BM],
R1=[M1R0,,MpR0],
R2=[M1R1,,MpR1],(5)
,
Rr=[M1Rr1,,MpRr1]
.

Due to the numerical stability properties of the repeated modified Gram-Schmidt process employed in [2] and [5], the reduced model derived from V in (4) is computed in a numerically stable and accurate way. Applications of the method in [2], [5] to the parametric models Gyroscope, Silicon nitride membrane, and Microthruster Unit, can be found in [6].

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 L. Daniel, O. C. Siong, L. S. Chay, K. H. Lee, and J.~White. "A multiparameter moment-matching model-reduction approach for generating geometrically parameterized interconnect performance models", IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst, 22(5): 678--693, 2004.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 L. Feng and P. Benner, "A Robust Algorithm for Parametric Model Order Reduction", In Proc. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (ICIAM 2007), 7(1): 10215.01--02, 2007.
  3. L. Feng, P. Benner, and J.G Korvink, "System-level modeling of MEMS by means of model order reduction (mathematical approximation)--mathematical background". In T. Bechtold, G. Schrag, and L. Feng, editors, System-Level Modeling of MEMS, Advanced Micro & Nanosystems. ISBN 978-3-527-31903-9, Wiley-VCH, 2013.
  4. A. Odabasioglu, M. Celik, and L. T. Pileggi, "PRIMA: passive reduced-order interconnect macromodeling algorithm", IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.,17(8):645--654,1998.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 L. Feng and P. Benner, "A robust algorithm for parametric model order reduction based on implicit moment matching", submitted.
  6. L. Feng, P. Benner, J.G Korvink, "Subspace recycling accelerates the parametric macromodeling of MEMS", International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 94(1): 84-110, 2013.